Legal Opinion

United States v. Tuff

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 4, 2005No. C04-570ZPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ZILLY, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on the Defendants’ first motion for summary judgment, docket no. 11, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, docket no. 32, and Defendants’ second motion for summary judgment, docket no. 35. The Court, having considered the briefs in support and opposition to the motions, hereby DENIES Defendants’ first and second motions for summary judgment and GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Procedural Background

On or about April 15, 2000, James H. Tuff and Rhonda Roberston Tuff, his wife, (together “Defendants”), filed a Form 1040…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palahnuk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Facq v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  3. Cidale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Kadillak v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  5. Racine v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API