Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bryant v. Blevins

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1994No. S034604Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent.

The majority concede that the agreed-boundary doctrine applies whether or not there is an available legal document—such as a deed or map—that purports to describe the location of the “true” boundary. (Maj. opn., ante, pp. 53-54.) However, they then in effect create two different standards of proof: if a legal description is available, the party asserting the agreed boundary must present direct evidence “that the prior owners were uncertain as to the location of the true boundary [and] that they agreed to fix their common boundary at the location of a fence.” (Maj. opn., ante, p.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hansen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API