Legal Opinion

Eschenburg v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 17, 1993No. Civ. A. 90-40303-FLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEDULING ORDER

NEWBLATT, District Judge.

Trial is set for July 12, 1993 at 8:00 a.m. Oral argument on the motions in limine will be held at 7:30 a.m. that morning. For now, the Court’s previous rulings on the motions will stand.

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment as to Count III, which combines Plaintiffs failure to warn claim and breach of duty to recall. This motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

FACTS

This case concerns an accident involving a type of farm machinery known as a combine. 1 On October 13, 1989,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gregory v. Cincinnati Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gregory v. Cincinnati Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API