Legal Opinion

Cincinnati St. Ry. Co. v. Waterman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1935No. 4685PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By -MATTHEWS, J.

In the first place,- the defendant presents as error the action of the trial court in permitting the use, over its objection, of a blackboard at the trial, without requiring the blackboard to be made a part of the record.

It seems that in accordance with a rather common practice a plat or diagram of ’the street intersection was chalked upon this blackboard by the plaintiff while - she was on the witness stand under oath, and 'was used in the examination of the witnesses bo'th by the plaintiff'and by the-defendant. It is admitted that this-method .of -presenting the case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dreihs v. Taxicabs of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Storey v. CastnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Crocker v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Gaylord v. HoarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. Miller v. LoyOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API