Cincinnati St. Ry. Co. v. Waterman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By -MATTHEWS, J.
In the first place,- the defendant presents as error the action of the trial court in permitting the use, over its objection, of a blackboard at the trial, without requiring the blackboard to be made a part of the record.
It seems that in accordance with a rather common practice a plat or diagram of ’the street intersection was chalked upon this blackboard by the plaintiff while - she was on the witness stand under oath, and 'was used in the examination of the witnesses bo'th by the plaintiff'and by the-defendant. It is admitted that this-method .of -presenting the case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dreihs v. Taxicabs of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by15 opinions
- Storey v. CastnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Crocker v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Gaylord v. HoarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Miller v. LoyOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.