Legal Opinion
Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 23, 1960PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 N.J. Super. 53 (1960)
158 A.2d 359
HOWARD CROSS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ROBERT E. LAMB, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TRUSKEY INDUSTRIAL PIPE FITTERS, INC., A CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 16, 1959.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.
Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos and Mr. John W. Hayden, Jr., attorneys).
Mr. Horace G. Brown argued the cause for…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Baron Tube Company, the Partnership of Hyman Baron and Jay Baron and Hyman Baron, Individually v. The Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Cozzi v. Owens Corning Fiber Glass Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Buscaglia v. Owens-Corning FiberglasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Rommell v. US Steel Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.