Gaylord v. Hoar
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The action is conversion. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant to purchase a 1960 Oldsmobile automobile on Oct. 10, 1959. The contract to purchase provided that the plaintiff was to receive a credit of $1,300.00 toward the purchase price of the new car for a trade-in of his 1957 DeSoto automobile, and he also paid to the defendant the sum of $50.00 at the time of signing the contract. Time of delivery of the new Oldsmobile to the plaintiff was to be made to the plaintiff “as soon as possible.” No offer of delivery was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Parker v. RobertsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Berkley v. Burlington Cadillac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Peterson v. MoultonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Cincinnati St. Ry. Co. v. WatermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pezzano v. BonneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Pond v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Tallarico v. BrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- DeYoung v. RuggerioSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Murray v. J & B International Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.