Dreihs v. Taxicabs of Cincinnati, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, J,
A great deal of the record is occupied by testimony of witnesses referring to a plat which is not before this court, and their description of what occurred, while probably aided by this plat for the advantage of the trial court and jury is valueless for the purpose of review by this court. Such factor must be considered by this court in passing upon the weight of the evidence, it being obvious that the trial court and jury would receive a much clearer conception of what occurred than one reviewing a record containing continuous references to a plat not before the reviewing court.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sallee v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cincinnati St. Ry. Co. v. WatermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1935