Legal Opinion

Fawkes v. Curtis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanics ’ lien. The issues are narrowed to the sole question of the application by the lien claimant, I. Block, of $3,134 of the proceeds of the check of $3,500; Block claiming in this suit the right to apply that amount in the payment of a note of $1,134, and a loan of $2,000 owing to him by H. H. Eichenberger, the principal contractor.

The parties to this litigation, at this time, are Elizabeth Curtis, owner, when the work was commenced, H. H. Eichenberger, her contractor, I. Block, the plumber and heating subcontractor, under Eichenberger, Gypsy Manor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowles Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hughes & Co. v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Jordan v. Bank of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Boyer-Van Kuran Lumber & Coal Co. v. Colonial Apartment House Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  5. L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. COURTEMANCHEOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. National Surety Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Fulton v. Des JardinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Amato v. FULLINGTON ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API