Hughes & Co. v. Flint
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered November 15, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a material-man’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Appellant, who is a dealer in plumbers’ supplies, furnished respondent James Maxwell, a contractor, material and supplies for a building then in course of construction. The building belonged to the respondents Flint, and was known as the Flint job, and was so entered on the books of the appellant, it being the custom of appellant to keep such accounts separate and sell only with reference to the particular job. Maxwell had several accounts unpaid and overdue on the 80th day of September, 1908. On that day a check was drawn by respondent Fred Flint, payable to the order of Maxwell for the sum…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowles Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Frazer v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Kelso v. Russell & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Sherwood v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Fowler v. COURTEMANCHEOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.