Legal Opinion

F.B.I. Farms, Inc. v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2003No. 76S03-0209-CV-491PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that as a general proposition, restrictions on corporate share transfers may require approval of the transfer by the corporation's Board of Directors, at least in a family-owned corporation. Although generally valid against purchasers with notice of them, such restrictions may not prevent a creditor from foreclosing a lien on the shares, but a purchaser who buys at a foreclosure sale with notice of the restrictions acquires the shares subject to the restrictions. We also hold that if shares are subject to a right of first refusal, and the holder of the right has notice…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. First Federal Savings Bank of Indiana v. Key Markets, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Barrett v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Marriage of Castonguay v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Doss v. YinglingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pennfield Oil Company v. WinstromNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Coca-Cola Co. v. Babyback's International, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Dewey v. BechtholdDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
  4. Gatlin Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Estate of YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Lori Nicklas v. Von Tobel Corporation, Individually, and d/b/a Von Tobel Lumber and Von Tobel Lumber Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API