United States v. Nicholas Palumbo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a denial by the district court of a motion by Nicholas Pa-lumbo, a federal prisoner, for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976). 1 Palum- bo contends that the indictment under which he was charged and convicted incorrectly stated that the drug Percodan 2 is a Schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 812(c) and 21 C.F.R. § 1308.12 (1976). 3 The district court declined to address the merits of this contention, holding that Palumbo was barred from relitigating the issue because it had been fully adjudicated at…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Robert Dennis SwinehartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Diamen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. AbbottDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- United States v. WolczikDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Huggins v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.