Legal Opinion

United States v. Nicholas Palumbo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 31, 1979No. 79-1701PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a denial by the district court of a motion by Nicholas Pa-lumbo, a federal prisoner, for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976). 1 Palum- bo contends that the indictment under which he was charged and convicted incorrectly stated that the drug Percodan 2 is a Schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 812(c) and 21 C.F.R. § 1308.12 (1976). 3 The district court declined to address the merits of this contention, holding that Palumbo was barred from relitigating the issue because it had been fully adjudicated at…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Dennis SwinehartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Diamen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. AbbottDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. United States v. WolczikDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Huggins v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API