Legal Opinion
Huggins v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 24, 2014No. Crim. No. 03-91-SLR; Civ. No. 11-737-SLRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Andre M. Huggins (“movant”) is a federal inmate currently confined at the Fairton Federal Correctional Institution in Fair-ton, New Jersey. Movant timely filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (D.I. 358; D.I. 368) The government filed an answer in opposition. (D.I. 383) For the reasons discussed, the court will deny mov-ant’s § 2255 motion without holding an evidentiary hearing.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
The case against movant arose out of a joint investigation conducted by the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BAKER v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- BRODIE v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- EVDOKIMOW v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- FALCI v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Jessie Tullies v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.