In re the Detention of Brooks
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Guy, J.*
In these consolidated cases Scott W. Brooks and Rudolph Franklin ask this court to determine whether either chapter 71.09 RCW (known as the sexually violent predator statute), as amended in 1995 and in 2001, or this court’s decision in In re Personal Restraint of Young, 122 Wn.2d 1, 857 P.2d 989 (1993), requires at the probable cause hearing and commitment trial consideration of less restrictive alternatives to total confinement. Brooks alone argues that chapter 71.09 RCW is unconstitutional because *279it allows the commitment of a person upon a showing short of what he claims is the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Commitment of W.Z.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Hale v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.