State v. Willis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
In this case we are asked to decide whether the Minnesota Rules of Evidence apply to restitution' hearings held under Minn. Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(b) (2016).1 The district court overruled objections to documents the State offered during the restitution hearing, concluding that the Rules of Evidence did not apply. The court *644of appeals affirmed in relevant part, concluding that because restitution is part of a defendant’s sentence and Minn. R. Evid. 1101 exempts sentencing from the Rules of Evidence, the rules do not apply to restitution hearings. Because we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Lorix v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Lee Vick, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025