Claypool v. Mohawk Motor, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
One of the specific charges of negligence on the part of the defendant, which it is claimed caused plaintiff’s injury, was the failure to have any lights on the rear of its trailer.
Whether there were any lights on the rear of the trailer which were burning at the time of the collision was a matter in controversy and the record discloses a sharp conflict in the evidence in respect thereto.
Charges of negligence of the defendant enumerated in the petition were, among others, failure “to have any taillight in operation on its tractor or trailers” and failure “to have lights on its tractor and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- H. E. Culbertson Co. v. WardenOhio Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Roszman v. SammettOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Texas & N. O. R. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Mills v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.