Legal Opinion
Webb v. Ray
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 18, 1984No. 5782-8-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Matthew Paul Webb appeals a judgment apportioning liability between himself and Dishman Paint & Body, Inc., (Dishman) for work performed on his Corvette. We reverse and remand.
In March 1981, Kim Ray, an independent contractor, orally agreed to repair, paint, and clean the engine of Matthew Webb's 1969 Corvette for $1,000. While the work was in progress, Kim Ray was hired by Dishman; and on September 8, 1981, the partially completed Corvette was removed to Dishman without Matthew Webb's knowledge or consent.
Matthew Webb remained in contact with Kim Ray, conferring with him regarding progress…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- I-5 Truck Sales & Service Co. v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Bennett v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Garth Parberry Equipment Repairs, Inc. v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Schreiber v. KelseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Schreiber v. KelseyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Huffmaster v. RobinsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Gragg v. Orange Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Bill McCurley Chevrolet, Inc. v. RutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.