Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Valley Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1929No. Civil No. 2776PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

Ezra W. Thayer, hereinafter entitled plaintiff, brought suit against the Valley Bank, a corporation, hereinafter entitled defendant, praying that defendant he declared to be holding the net profits of a sale of certain real estate in trust for plaintiff and others, and for an accounting of said trust. Defendant demurred generally to the amended complaint, which demurrer was by the trial court sustained, and, plaintiff electing to stand upon his com plaint, judgment was entered dismissing the action. From the judgment plaintiff has appealed.

There is hut one question presented on appeal, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Parsons v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Pitcher v. Lone Pine-Surprise Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Shaw v. Hollister Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Heffern Co-operative Consolidated Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. GauthierArizona Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jeppi v. Brockman Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ellison v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Sutherland v. Kaonohi Ohana, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Jeppi v. Brockman Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Nancy E. Sutherland and Donald Sutherland and Stephen Newnham, Trustees of the Ralph L. Evans Trust v. Kaonohi Ohana, Ltd., Kaonohi Ohana, Ltd. v. Nancy E. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API