Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Big Four Auto Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 16, 1915PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

This suit was brought by P. L. Patterson, Joe Lucas, James Massey, and S. A. Kelly, partners, doing business under the assumed name of the “Big Four Ante Company,” against the appellants, as defendants, to recover $284, the amount of two notes executed by the defendants to the Big Four Auto Company, growing out of some transactions between the parties about an automobile.

The defendants, for the purpose of defeating the action, pleaded and relied on Section 199b of the Kentucky Statutes, the first sub-section of which reads as follows:

“No person or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gay v. . SeiboldNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Oliver Co. v. Louisville Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co. v. ChattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hayes v. Providence Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Huey v. PassarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. GibbsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API