Legal Opinion
Lower Paxton Township v. Fieseler Neon Signs
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 13, 1978No. Appeal, No. 971 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DiSalle,
Exxon Corporation (Exxon) filed this appeal.from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County dated April 15, 1977. The order denied Exxon’s motion to quash the appeal of the Board of Supervisors of Lower Paxton Township (Township) from the determination by the Township’s Zoning Hearing Board (Board) that Exxon’s contractor, Fieseler Neon Signs (Fieseler), was entitled- to a variance to place a high rise sign 98 feet above an Exxon gas station.
On September 13, 1976, Fieseler applied to the Township for a building permit to construct a- sign on property…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Zerbe Township School District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Ventura v. Skylark Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Turner v. May Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Leoni v. Whitpain Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- The Metropolitan Government of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee v. The Board of Zoning Appeals Of Nashville And Davidson County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Grove v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Oxford Investments, L.P. v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.