Legal Opinion

Ventura v. Skylark Motel, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1968No. Appeal, No. 181PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

Francisco Ventura instituted this action in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries suffered, while working in a trench which collapsed and caved in. These are the record facts which are pertinent to the question dispositive of this appeal.

One Township Line Corporation, the owner of certain land, engaged Van Cor, Inc., as prime contractor to construct a motel thereon. Van Cor, Inc., then engaged Wolfson & Schnoll, Inc., as subcontractor to install all the plumbing, including any excavations required. Wolfson & Schnoll, Inc., in turn subcontracted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Adcox v. PA. MFGRS'ASSN. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API