Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Wassman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1929No. Nos. 21215, 21216, and 21217PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Each of these suits grew out of the same transaction. In the Wassman and Finnell cases the pleadings and supporting facts are similar, and they may be disposed of together. In both cases the petitions are alike. After reciting the contract with the board of education, the giving of the bond, the furnishing of labor and material, and the acceptance of the school building by the board on May 8, 1925, the petitions allege that, within 90 days after such acceptance, the plaintiffs, through one Tyler, the clerk of the board of education, furnished the surety a statement of the amount due for labor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. White v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HowleOhio Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clark v. Southview Hospital & Family Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Torrance v. RomOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Rubbo v. Hughes Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Clark v. Southview Hosp. & Family Health Ctr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API