Legal Opinion

Black v. Sippy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1888PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Linn County.

1Opinion of the CourtLoud, C. J.

This was-an action to recover money for goods and merchandise sold and delivered, and the liability of the defendant is founded on section 10 of the Act of October 21, 1878. (Sess. Laws, 1878, p. 94.) A demurrer was interposed to the complaint, on the ground that the facts stated did not constitute a cause-of action, which being sustained, and judgment rendered thereon, the plaintiff has appealed to this court. The material facts, without detail, which the demurrer admits, are, that the assignors of the plaintiff at the time alleged, and at the special instance and request of the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Smedley v. FeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Frost v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Lawrence v. SinnamonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Watkins v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cranston v. West Coast Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Schreyer v. Turner Flouring Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Stringham v. Mutual Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Kiernan v. KratzOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1899

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API