Legal Opinion
United States v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 27, 2010No. Civil 10-2275 (PAM/JSM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs Motion is granted and Defendants’ Motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
1. Facts
Defendants include Xcel Energy, Inc., a multi-billion dollar, publicly traded utility holding company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Xcel has four wholly owned subsidiaries, including Northern States Power-Minnesota (“NSP”) and Xcel Energy Services, Inc., which are named defendants in this ease. NSP provides…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Acker v. Environmental Resources Management, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Bell v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Cortec Corporation v. Corpac GmbH & Co. KGDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Mell v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society, TheDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Phillips v. Caliber Home LoansDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.