Legal Opinion

Betty Brooks, Inc. v. Insurance Placement Facility of Delaware

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 2, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal and cross-appeal involves a claim by the plaintiffs, Betty Brooks, Inc. and William F. Brooks, to recover from The Insurance Placement Facility of Delaware (IPF), their insurance carrier, under a fire and extended coverage insurance policy for damages sustained to the roof of a building as a result of a windstorm. We first turn to the pertinent facts.

I

In June 1977, IPF issued fire and extended coverage insurance covering plaintiffs’ property. The policy contained the following provision:

“Suit. No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rumsey Electric Co. v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  2. Ottendorfer v. Aetna Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. Hazewski v. JacksonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Gribble v. Royal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Closser v. Penn Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Weiss v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of DelawareBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Woodward v. Farm Family Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of New Castle County v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Lomax v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API