Gribble v. Royal Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Southerland, C.J.:
This is a suit upon a policy of insurance to recover a loss to plaintiffs’ house caused by a rupture of the hot water heating system, a risk covered by the policy.
On August 8, 1956, the defendant Royal Insurance Company issued to plaintiffs, owners of a dwelling near Newark, Delaware, a “Home Owners Policy” of insurance. Included in the risks insured is the rupture of a steam or hot water heating system. There was a mortgage on the premises and, according to the usual practice, the original policy containing the standard mortgagee clause was sent to the mortgagee. At some…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bonnert v. Pennsylvania Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Murray v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
- Emory v. Glens Falls InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brandywine One Hundred Corp. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Closser v. Penn Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Ottendorfer v. Aetna Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Betty Brooks, Inc. v. Insurance Placement Facility of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of New Castle County v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.