Legal Opinion

Gribble v. Royal Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 15, 1960No. 19, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C.J.:

This is a suit upon a policy of insurance to recover a loss to plaintiffs’ house caused by a rupture of the hot water heating system, a risk covered by the policy.

On August 8, 1956, the defendant Royal Insurance Company issued to plaintiffs, owners of a dwelling near Newark, Delaware, a “Home Owners Policy” of insurance. Included in the risks insured is the rupture of a steam or hot water heating system. There was a mortgage on the premises and, according to the usual practice, the original policy containing the standard mortgagee clause was sent to the mortgagee. At some…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bonnert v. Pennsylvania Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Murray v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
  3. Emory v. Glens Falls InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brandywine One Hundred Corp. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  2. Closser v. Penn Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Ottendorfer v. Aetna Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Betty Brooks, Inc. v. Insurance Placement Facility of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of New Castle County v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API