Legal Opinion
Lomax v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 15, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 88-300 LONPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
This is a civil action based on diversity of citizenship brought by Plaintiff Walter Lo-max, Sr., administrator of the Estate of Walter Lomax, Jr., against Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”). Plaintiff seeks damages for Defendant’s alleged bad faith refusal to arbitrate on the reformed uninsured motorist policy of Kenneth E. Murrey. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment claiming that no genuine issues of material fact exist and that the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
I. FACTS
On November 27, 1980, Walter Lomax,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walter Lomax, Sr., Administrator of the Estate of Walter Lomax, Jr. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. VegaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- State of Delaware v. FrenchSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017