Legal Opinion

Bulis v. Wells

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1977No. 4590PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

The sole issue raised in this appeal concerns the lower court’s interpretation of the effect of a lease which contained the following language:

“It is further agreed that Lessee shall have exclusive opption [sic] to renew said above lease. It [sic] said Lessee choosess [sic] to do so at his option.”

The trial court considered extrinsic evidence, related to the parties’ intention at the time they executed the lease and to negotiations which were preliminary thereto, to reach its judgment that the appellant-lessees’ right to exercise the above-mentioned option was conditioned on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Shepard v. Top Hat Land & Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Goodman v. KellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. North American Uranium, Inc. v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bushnell v. ElkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rouse v. MunroeWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API