Legal Opinion

Ruppe ex rel. Estate of Ruppe v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1996No. 2532PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this declaratory judgment action, Respondents Wayne M. and Betty W. Ruppe (the Ruppes) sought judicial determination of the applicable limit of coverage under a policy of liability insurance issued by Appellant Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners). The Ruppes sought to “stack” the $100,000 limit of liability coverage in a policy covering two au*426tomobiles. The trial court found the liability coverage could be stacked. Auto-Owners appeals. We affirm as modified.

The parties stipulated to the following facts. On September 14,1990, Linda Bagwell entered Interstate 85 in the wrong…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gov. Emp. Ins. Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Busby v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Jackson Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Giles v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Kraft v. Hartford Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruppe v. Auto-Owners InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Mangum v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API