Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 13, 2007No. AC 26628PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The petitioner, Jeffrey Pierce, appeals following the habeas court’s denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court (1) abused its discretion when it denied his motion to amend his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and (2) improperly rejected his claim that his appellate counsel and first habeas counsel provided ineffective assistance for failing to raise the issue of prosecutorial misconduct. We dismiss the appeal.

The relevant facts are set forth in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Correia v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crocker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Joseph v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. J.R. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Alexander v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. Crocker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API