Legal Opinion

Hamby v. McDaniel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1977PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

Certiorari was granted in this case to reexamine prior judicial interpretations of the Wrongful Death Statute, that a viable fetus suffering tortious injury en ventre sa mere does not come within the intendment of the statute, unless born alive.

The Hambys ask that we extend the scope of the Wrongful Death Statute by holding that a viable fetus is a person within the meaning and intent of T.C.A. 20-607.

A majority of the Court adheres to the rule established in Hogan v. McDaniel, 204 Tenn. 235, 319 S.W.2d 221 (1958), and Shousha v. Matthews Drivurself Service, Inc., 210…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cunningham v. CunninghamTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Missouri v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Hogan v. McDanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. OdomTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hicks v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stewart v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lanier v. RainsTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API