Legal Opinion

Princiotta v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1990No. S-3161PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal is from the denial of a Civil Rule 60(b) motion to set aside two confessions of judgment without action entered into pursuant to Civil Rule 57(c) by Josef Princiotta in favor of the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA). We reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On June 15, 1984, Princiotta and the MOA entered into a contract calling for Princiotta, a sculptor, to craft a large metallic statue of an eagle to adorn the Chug-iak Senior Housing Center. The MOA advanced Princiotta the sum of $12,000. Neither party has seen fit to preserve the contract or any of its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson Waste Materials v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gregor v. HodgesAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Mallonee v. GrowAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dickerson v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Benedict v. Key Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In the Matter of the Estate of Alexina RodmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API