Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. House

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1928No. 8 Div. 982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The Workmen’s Compensation Law (Code 1923, §§ 7534-7597) contemplates that conclusions of fact must be based on legal evidence; but, where there is any legal evidence to support the finding of the trial court, such finding is conclusive, and no technical questions as to the admissibility of evidence will be considered on appeal. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Co., 207 Ala. 219, 92 So. 458; Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803; Ex parte H. T. Smith Lumber Co., 206 Ala. 483, 90 So. 807. This means, of course, that the conclusion reached and expressed cannot be allowed to rest on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Ex Parte ShawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  2. Malbis Bakery Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Houser v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Gulf States Creosoting Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Semmes Nurseries, Inc. v. McVaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API