Legal Opinion

Houser v. Young

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1946No. 8 Div. 337PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

Compensation is sought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 253 et seq., for injuries suffered by C. H. Young, an employee in the sawmill of Claude L. Houser. Upon the conclusion of the evidence the court in awarding compensation found “as a matter of law, that the said plaintiff employee was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.” The question for decision is whether appellee was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

We will not weigh the evidence and if on any reasonable view of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Malbis Bakery Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. HouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Baggett Transp. Co. v. HolderfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API