Legal Opinion
Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1988No. 88-1774PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant appeals from the district court’s denial of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification. However, the denial of Rule 54(b) certification is not appealable. See Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 692 F.2d 172, 174 (1st Cir.1982). Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted.
Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is denied as moot.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anne M. Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Tri-State Generation And Transmission Association, Inc. v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Estate of KishNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Alfredo Patrick Acosta, and Rose Malfabon, Applicant-In-Intervention/appellant v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Ed Wansley v. Speed CorporationMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.