Alfredo Patrick Acosta, and Rose Malfabon, Applicant-In-Intervention/appellant v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., a California Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
24 F.3d 244
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Alfredo Patrick ACOSTA, Plaintiff,
and
Rose Malfabon, Applicant-in-Intervention/Appellant,
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California Corporation,
et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-17088.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 11, 1994.*
Decided May 13, 1994.
Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Derek A. McCall v. George DeedsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- William Alexander v. Joseph C. SachaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971