Legal Opinion

Craig H. Hisaw, Inc. v. Bishop

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1972No. 11042PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a new trial. Bishop drilled wells for Hisaw under a written contract and when not paid filed a lien. Hisaw then filed this action, seeking to quiet title to the land and to have Bishop’s lien declared void. Bishop counter-claimed for foreclosure of the lien. The district court rendered judgment in favor of Bishop. We affirm.

In November 1969 defendant-respondent, C.D. Bishop (hereinafter Bishop) agreed to drill two wells on land owned by plaintiff-appellant, counter-defendant, Craig H. Hisaw, Inc. (hereinafter Hisaw).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitt v. JarnaginIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Dawson v. EldredgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Summers v. DooleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Ivie v. PeckIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Layrite Products Company v. LuxIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State, Department of Law Enforcement v. One 1955 Willys Jeep, V.I.N. 573481691Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ready-To-Pour, Inc. v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Perry Plumbing Co. v. SchulerIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hanf v. Syringa Realty, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sundowner, Inc. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API