Legal Opinion

Layrite Products Company v. Lux

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1966No. 9746PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

This is a lien foreclosure action wherein a materialman furnished material used by a contractor in the construction of a home. Layrite Products Company, the plaintiff-appellant herein, a Washington corporation engaged in the business of the manufacture and sale of building materials, is the materialman. The contractor is Arsenault Masonry, Inc., also a Washington corporation. Joe Lux and Alphonsie Lux, husband and wife, the defendants-respondents herein, are the homeowners. Layrite sold building materials to Arsen-ault which were used in respondents’ house. The Luxes paid…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dawson v. EldredgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kendall Lumber & Coal Co. v. RomanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Gagnon v. St. Maries Light & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Willes v. PalmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Jackson v. Blue Flame Gas CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Nab v. HillsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bjornstad v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. University of Alaska v. Simpson Building Supply CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API