Summers v. Dooley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
This lawsuit, tried in the district court, involves a claim by one partner against the other for $6,000. The complaining partner asserts that he has been required to pay out more than $11,000 in expenses without any reimbursement from either the partnership funds or his partner. The expenditure in question was incurred by the complaining partner (John Summers, plaintiff-appellant) for the purpose of hiring an additional employee. The trial court denied him any relief except for ordering that he be entitled to one half $966.72 which it found to be a legitimate partnership…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McQuiston's AdoptionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Clarke v. Slate v. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Barnett v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Motorcoach Operators Ass'n v. Board of Street Railway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by36 opinions
- J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Gavica v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Volk v. BaldazoIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Umphrey v. SprinkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Carpenter v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.