State v. Johnson

¶1 — In a late-filed appeal,1 a pro se statement of additional grounds, and a timely personal re*306straint petition, James Johnson challenges the sufficiency of evidence to support his conviction of second degree assault, the sentencing court’s imposition of legal financial obligations, its directive that he provide a DNA2 sample, and the effectiveness of his counsel’s assistance at trial and on appeal.

¶2 In the published portion of this opinion, we address Mr. Johnson’s claim that imposing the mandatory DNA fee provided by RCW 43.43.7541 violates equal protection when applied to a repeat…