Legal Opinion

Belkus v. Murdoch

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff on the second count of his declaration which alleges, in effect, *87that the defendant, an attorney at law, by virtue of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 221, § 51, owes him as the client a sum of money that he has unreasonably neglected to pay upon demand, together with five times the lawful interest. Griffiths v. Powers, 216 Mass. 169. The only exceptions taken at the trial that have been argued are to the exclusion of two alleged assignments to the plaintiff’s intestate and to the denial of two requests for rulings. Apart from the testimony of the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Doyle v. DixonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Malden Trust Co. v. PerlmuterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Low Supply Co. v. PappacostopoulousMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Dziegiel v. Town of WestfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. MabreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  2. Arena v. John P. Squire Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Chaplain v. DugasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Phillips v. LarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Feaver v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API