In Re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court is AcroMed Corporation’s (“AcroMed”) Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Pretrial Orders 409 and 438 issued by this court in MDL 1014 (Docket #3859). 1 AcroMed has requested the court to reconsider its ruling in both Orders and to deny the motions to remand cases in which Plaintiffs have alleged a conspiracy claim predicated on alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and the Medical Device Amendments (“MDAs”) thereto. AcroMed offers in support of its motion a recent decision from the United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bhagwanani v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Alberto San, Inc. v. Consejo De Titulares Del Condominio San AlbertoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Chinniah v. East Pennsboro TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- FALCONE v. DICKSTEINDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- WEISMAN v. BAURDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021