Legal Opinion
Raymond v. Baehr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1968No. 40966PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
This is an appeal from orders of the trial court denying plaintiffs’ motions for a new trial as to defendants E. J. and M. S. Baehr.
The facts and circumstances which gave rise to the suit are the same as those in Raymond v. Baehr, 282 Minn. 102, 163 N. W. (2d) 54 (Nos. 41031 and 41032), and we see no need to repeat them as they are amply set out in that opinion. We therefore confine ourselves to those points directly related to the issues raised in this appeal.
Plaintiffs contended that negligence on the part of the defendants Baehr in the construction of the Baehr…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Judd v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- L. A. Thompson Scenic Railway Co. v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Town of Burnsville v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- City of Alamogordo v. McGeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lazy Mountain Land Club v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment & AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Alderman's Inc. v. ShanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- County of Fairfax v. Southern Iron Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Mervin v. Magney Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Raymond v. BaehrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.