Legal Opinion

Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1995No. C4-93-1006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This case requires us to interpret various provisions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and determine its application in a negligence action resulting from a fire which caused considerable property damage, but no loss of life. Primarily, we are asked to determine whether a violation of the UFC constitutes negligence as a matter of law and if so, under what circumstances the UFC’s grandfather clause precludes liability for nonconforming conditions in buildings that predate the code.

A fire started in Roberts Drug & Hallmark Card Shop and swept through neighboring…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Johnson v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of BalatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Lynghaug v. PayteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Butler v. EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Heath Ex Rel. Holdyn H. v. La Mariana ApartmentsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Gradjelick v. HanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API