Legal Opinion

Garner v. Garner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1966No. 528PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The sole question presented is whether the court below erred in dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action on the ground of res judicata.

The doctrine of res judicata applies to divorce actions as well as other civil cases. Thurston v. Thurston, 99 Mass. 39; Miller v. Miller, 92 Va. 196; Dwyer v. Dwyer, 26 Mo. App. 647; Ford v. Ford (Okla.) 108 P. 366; Prall v. Prall, 50 S. 867 (Fla.); Lee: N. C. Family Law, Vol. 1, Sec. 51, p. 213—Joinder of Causes.

The appellant contends that the provision of G.S. 50-16 (as amended in 1955) granting the wife the remedy of independent action or cross-action where…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Painter v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Smoky Mountain Enterprises, Inc. v. Jesse RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. vanDOOREN v. vanDOORENCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Mason v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API