Smoky Mountain Enterprises, Inc. v. Jesse Rose
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant contends that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s cause of action on the ground of res judicata.
There had been no jury trial in the prior action before Judge Martin. Hence, the plea was determinable on the facts disclosed, by the judgment roll in that case. No question was raised as to the authenticity of the judgment entered by Judge Martin. It is incorporated in the agreed case on appeal. Burbank did not objéct to the findings of fact made by Judge Martin and did not appeal from the judgment dismissing that action. See 1 Strong, N.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Williams v. PeabodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- American Film Technologies, Inc. v. Taritero (In Re American Film Technologies, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1994
- Fed. Point Yacht Club Ass'n, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.