Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 8, 2018No. AC39493PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

The petitioner, Mark Henderson, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion by denying his petition for certification to appeal on the ground that it was untimely 1 and, in the alternative, on its merits. With respect to the petitioner's claim that the habeas court abused its discretion in its consideration of the merits of the petition, he claims that the court erroneously determined that, by virtue of his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Villafane v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Whistnant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  3. Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Finney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. Baltas v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API