Legal Opinion
Laura Piao v. William Smith and Jennings Smith Investigations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 21, 2017No. 15-426-cvUnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Laura Piao appeals the December 23, 2014 judgment of the district court, granting a motion for judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendants, pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 On appeal, Piao argues that the district court erred in entering judgment as a matter of law that no reasonable jury could have found that William Smith and Jennings Smith Investigations, Inc. (jointly, the “defendants”) engaged in unfair or deceptive conduct or caused the plaintiff an ascer tainable loss in violation of the Connecticut Unfair…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- ING Global v. United Parcel Service Oasis Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Phyllis Meloff v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Artie's Auto Body, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waterbury Generation LLC v. Waterbury Land Partners LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021