Legal Opinion
Muniz v. Kravis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 5, 2000No. AC 18356PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiff Mercedes Muniz1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of the defendants’ motion to strike the *706plaintiffs amended complaint.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that she failed to demonstrate the requisite elements of a cause of action for (1) intentional infliction of emotional distress, as claimed in count three of the amended complaint, and (2) unfair trade practices pursuant to the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., as claimed in count…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Bouchard v. SundbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Dollard v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Biro v. HirschConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Edwards v. North American Power & Gas, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.