Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. York
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided December 11, 1997No. 7:09-misc-07001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
The defendant, Larry York D/B/A HLT Check Exchange, LLP (“HLT”), has moved the Court [Record No. 4] to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims. The plaintiffs, Gregory and Dana Hamilton (“Hamiltons”), have responded [Record No. 7], to which HLT has replied [Record No. 8]. This matter is now ripe for decision.
The following are the pertinent facts. On August 22, 1996, the Hamiltons began doing business with HLT, a licensed check cashing company, in Pikeville, Kentucky. The Ham-iltons engaged in two types of transactions with HLT: (1) “check cashing”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Lrl Properties v. Portage Metro Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Hurt v. Crystal Ice Cold Storage CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Harding v. Kentucky Title Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
3Cited by8 opinions
- White v. Check Holders, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- McKenzie Check Advance of Florida v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Austin v. Alabama Check Cashers Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Henry v. Cash Today, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Turner v. E-Z Check Cashing of Cookeville, TN, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.