Legal Opinion

White v. Check Holders, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1999No. 98-SC-739-CLPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

Pürsuant to CR 76.37(1), this Court granted the certification request of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky to answer the following question of law:

When a check cashing company licensed under KRS 368 et seq. accepts and defers deposit on a check pursuant to an agreement with the maker of the check, is the service fee charged by the check cashing company a “service fee” and not “interest” under KRS 368 .100(2), or is the fee “interest” which is subject to the usury laws and disclosure provisions in KRS Chapter 360?

To resolve this issue of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beckham v. Bd. of Educ. of Jefferson Cty.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Revenue CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hagan v. FarrisKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. McCracken County Fiscal Court v. GravesKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Barnes v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Beverly Burden v. Check Into Cash of Kentucky, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. McManus v. Kentucky Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. RekerKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Alexander v. S & M MOTORS, INC.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Johnson v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API